Supplemental Material for Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests: Making Transparent How Design Choices Shape Research Results

Supplemental Material for

Crowdsourcing Hypothesis Tests: Making Transparent How Design Choices Shape Research Results

Justin F. Landy

, Miaolei (Liam) Jia, Isabel L. Ding, Domenico Viganola, Warren Tierney, Anna Dreber, Magnus Johannesson, Thomas Pfeiffer, Charles R. Ebersole, Quentin F. Gronau, Alexander Ly, Don van den Bergh, Maarten Marsman, Koen Derks, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Andrew Proctor, Daniel M. Bartels, Christopher W. Bauman, William J. Brady, Felix Cheung, Andrei Cimpian, Simone Dohle, M. Brent Donnellan, Adam Hahn, Michael P. Hall, William Jiménez-Leal, David J. Johnson, Richard E. Lucas, Benoît Monin, Andres Montealegre, Elizabeth Mullen, Jun Pang, Jennifer Ray, Diego A. Reinero, Jesse Reynolds, Walter Sowden, Daniel Storage, Runkun Su, Christina M. Tworek, Jay J. Van Bavel, Daniel Walco, Julian Wills, Xiaobing Xu, Kai Chi Yam, Xiaoyu Yang, William A. Cunningham, Martin Schweinsberg, Molly Urwitz, , and Eric L. Uhlmann

Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 146, No. 5, pp. 451–479

View article:

https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000220

Files:

bul0000220_Supplemental-Materials.docx

This content was submitted by the author as supplemental material for an article published in APA PsycArticles. The content is presented as the author submitted it. APA assumes no liability for errors or omissions and makes no warranties of any kind. APA assumes no responsibility for any reader’s use of the materials. All questions regarding the supplemental material should be directed to the corresponding author of the published article.

The reader is expected to respect the intellectual property of the author and the copyright of the American Psychological Association. The content should not be reused without permission from the author and the American Psychological Association.